[Pellet-users] SWRL rules execution

[Evren Sirin]

On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Silvi Hudson <silvi.hudson at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Evren,
>
> thanks for your reply. I've been debugging my rules, it seems though that I
> have something wrong with the SWRL rule I am writing. However, when I edit
> my rule, Pellet now shows different results everytime I run it. Do you think
> that something still wrong with the rule. Or under what circumstances, Peelt
> shows different results everytime it classifies the ontology with SWRL
> rules?

Under the circumstance that there is a bug in the code :) You should
get the same answers with the same ontology all the time (even though
the time it takes to generate answers may vary). If you can provide
the ontology causing this issue we can debug the problem.

Cheers,
Evren


>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Silvi
>
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Silvi Hudson <silvi.hudson at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hello All,
>> >
>> > Can anyone give me some hints, tips, and helpful ideas of how I can get
>> > Pellet 2.0 to execute SWRL rules faster. A rule with 20 conjunctions on
>> > a
>> > factsbase with 200 individuals takes almost forever on P4.
>> >
>> > Am i missing something or this is an expected behavior of reasoners when
>> > reasoning with SWRL?
>>
>> Did you see my previous reply
>> <http://lists.owldl.com/pipermail/pellet-users/2009-February/003362.html>?
>> As I said in that message we can say something more specific if we can
>> see the data you are using.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Evren
>>
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Silvi
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pellet-users mailing list
> Pellet-users at lists.owldl.com
> http://lists.owldl.com/mailman/listinfo/pellet-users
> _______________________________________________
>
> Sponsored by Clark & Parsia, LLC http://clarkparsia.com/
>