[Pellet-users] Incremental Reasoning.

[Chris Halaschek]

On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Michael Smith <msmith at clarkparsia.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 12:58 -0300, Alex Pinheiro das Graças wrote:
>> Yes, you're right Michael. So I will redo mu question
>> I'd like to know is it is usable the incremental researching
>> Based on what Chris said ( Thank you for explanation Chris)
>> I will build the application in this way
>> Use incremental for add individual
>> but for deletions I will redo the reasoning model.
>
> This sounds like a reasonable approach.  Note that incremental reasoning
> is configurable with and without deletion supported and that "redo" will
> happen with the Jena interface.  I.e., if have initialized the
> PelletOptions correctly (as in the example program [1]), your
> application shouldn't need to consider incremental reasoning, it should
> just see faster response times from the methods requiring reasoning.
>
>> Pellet incremental reasoning is stable for adding, right?
>
> We believe so and hope that if you discover otherwise you report back to
> us.

Addition updates have been extensively tested and should be stable. As
Mike suggested, certainly provide feedback if you encounter issues.

Cheers,
Chris

-- 
Christian Halaschek-Wiener, Ph.D.
Web page: http://www.mindswap.org/~chris