[Pellet-users] Using Jess API and Pellet OWL-API, possible?

[Koh Shu Lin]

Thanks Bijan for your reply. However, at this moment I would like to concentrate back on Pellet. 
 
I was trying out with SWRL in my ontology and I needed the SWRL builtins (i.e. swrlb:add, swrlb:mutiply,swrlb:stringEqualIgnoreCase), however Pellet ignores those rules that have such builtins when I did a test using the Jena API. 
1) Could anyone please explain why are such builtins ignored? Are ALL builtins not classified as DL Safe SWRL rules?
2) Is there any possible solutions within the scope of Pellet other than using Jess to execute the rules?
 
Thanks for your attention.
 
Best regards,Shu Lin> CC: pellet-users at lists.owldl.com> From: bijan at clarkparsia.com> Subject: Re: [Pellet-users] Using Jess API and Pellet OWL-API, possible?> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 22:01:42 +0100> To: kohshulin at hotmail.com> > I think, in some general sense, yes. Though, only with a fair bit of > hacking.> > There's a Protege3.x plugin (or set of plugins) that do swrlish and > jessic and swrljessic stuff. You might be able to get something out > of that.> > I can imagine several ways of combining Jess and Pellet depending on > whether you see Jess as a production rule system or as an > implementation of positive datalog. (Pellet actually includes a rete > engine to help with evaluating DL Safe SWRL rules; or it did at one > point :))> > Cheers,> Bijan.
_________________________________________________________________
Easily publish your photos to your Spaces with Photo Gallery.
http://get.live.com/photogallery/overview
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.owldl.com/pipermail/pellet-users/attachments/20080716/d0ac18f0/attachment.htm