[Pellet-users] Check for no subclass
Alexander Musidlowski
musidlow at informatik.hu-berlin.de
Wed Feb 27 10:56:40 UTC 2008
Hi,
thx for your explanation and yes, i was confused therefore i wrote to
this list :D
Maybe a little summary of my understanding. If A subclass of B and B
subclass of A then A equivalent to B. That´s just logic. If there is
no subclass then i get owl:nothing because owl:nothing is subclass of
every class by definition.
If a class is equivalent to owl:nothing this would mean this class is
an empty set (in logical sense). This class doesn´t have any
instances. So if there is a class with some instances it can´t be
equivalent to owl:nothing but it can be that there is no equivalent
class, so it returns an empty set which does not mean that is
equivalent to an empty set.
I think that´s to point, there are two different meanings which
you should know. One is the "empty" Class and the other means just
there is no class.
Thx!
--
Bye
Alex
on Sunday, February 24, 2008 at 18:39 Pellet-users Pellet-users wrote:
> On Feb 24, 2008, at 2:58 PM, Bijan Parsia wrote:
>> On Feb 24, 2008, at 1:55 PM, Alexander Musidlowski wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> i think you refer to the sentence "and owl:Nothing is a subclass of
>>> every class". As EquivalentClass is a SubProperty of Subclass
>>
>> I don't know where you got that idea, but it's not true. Neither is
>> subclass a subproperty of equivalentclass.
> What a brain fart. I get confused by the "property" talk with regard
> to connectives.
> "subproperty" just means "only if"; equivalent means "iff". If A is
> equivClass to B, then A is a subclass of B (and B is a subclass of A).
> [snip pretty much ok reasoning but still might be confusing]
>>> shouldn´t it also return owl:nothing?
>>
>> As you can see above, no.
> [snip]
> If equivalentClass(A,B) then subclass(A,C), NOT if subclass(A,B) then
> equivalentClass(A,B).
> So, owl:Nothing being a subclass of a class tells us nothing about
> what its equivalent to. Or, equivalently., what is a subclass of
> owl:Nothing.
> So, still no :) I hope this is clearer.
> Cheers,
> Bijan.
> _______________________________________________
> Pellet-users mailing list
> Pellet-users at lists.owldl.com
> http://lists.owldl.com/mailman/listinfo/pellet-users
> _______________________________________________
> Sponsored by Clark & Parsia, LLC http://clarkparsia.com/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 183 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.owldl.com/pipermail/pellet-users/attachments/20080227/66c2ac04/attachment.pgp
More information about the Pellet-users
mailing list