[Pellet-users] R: SWRL and OWL (to Andrea)

martin.kardos.pego at pegonet.sk martin.kardos.pego at pegonet.sk
Thu Apr 17 21:16:29 UTC 2008


This example with uncle, father and brother is good but doesn't it make
without SWRL only with OWL?

  Thanks
             Matoo

> SWRL in an extention of OWL and provides functionalities of first order
> logics: if you have to model explicit inference rules (for example "IF
> james is jim's father AND george in james' brother, THEN george in jim's
> uncle")
> Bye
> Andrea
>
>
> -----Messaggio originale-----
> Da: pellet-users-bounces at lists.owldl.com per conto di
> martin.kardos.pego at pegonet.sk
> Inviato: gio 17/04/2008 22.04
> A: pellet-users at lists.owldl.com
> Oggetto: [Pellet-users] SWRL and OWL
>
> Hello,
>
>  I started with ontologies 1 month ago and it is very interessant for me
> but I am beginner an I have many question:-)  Now when is possible
> modeling ontology in OWL 1.1 it's needs to use in OWL some SWRL rule?
> What are an advantages of SWRL?
>
>  thanks
>
>             Matoo
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pellet-users mailing list
> Pellet-users at lists.owldl.com
> http://lists.owldl.com/mailman/listinfo/pellet-users
> _______________________________________________
>
> Sponsored by Clark & Parsia, LLC http://clarkparsia.com/
>
>





More information about the Pellet-users mailing list