[Pellet-users] performance difference between pellet command line and pellet-protege

[howard goldberg]

1.5rc1.
I rebuilt pellet from the zip distribution and pointed p4 to use the newly
built version so everything is running from the same build.

On 7/15/07, Ron Alford <ronwalf at umd.edu> wrote:
>
> howard goldberg wrote:
> > I have an 18K fragment of SNOMED anatomy with transitivity.  Classifies
> > in 4 minutes from the pellet command line, takes about an order of
> > magnitude longer within protege 4--over an hour last time I let it run.
> > Traced the protege classification within the debugger, spending time
> > within the phaseone classification loop. It would seem there is either a
> > representation difference or some missed optimization in p4 that
> > accounts for the much slower performance.  FACT++ in p4 classifies this
> > ontology in 3 to 4 minutes.  Had posted to the protege4 list; Matthew
> > Horridge asked me to post over here as well.
> >
>
> Can you post which version of pellet you are using?  I can't recall
> which version of pellet protege uses, but you might try replacing the
> jar files with your zippier version.  There was a goof-up in which
> optimizations were enabled by default in 1.5RC1.  See
> https://cvsdude.com/trac/clark-parsia/pellet-devel/ticket/23
> for details.
>
>
> -Ron
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.owldl.com/pipermail/pellet-users/attachments/20070716/02469170/attachment.htm