[Pellet-users] performance difference between pellet command line and pellet-protege

[howard goldberg]

I have an 18K fragment of SNOMED anatomy with transitivity.  Classifies in 4
minutes from the pellet command line, takes about an order of magnitude
longer within protege 4--over an hour last time I let it run.  Traced the
protege classification within the debugger, spending time within the
phaseone classification loop. It would seem there is either a representation
difference or some missed optimization in p4 that accounts for the much
slower performance.  FACT++ in p4 classifies this ontology in 3 to 4
minutes.  Had posted to the protege4 list; Matthew Horridge asked me to post
over here as well.

Thanks,
Howard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.owldl.com/pipermail/pellet-users/attachments/20070715/a81b0baf/attachment.htm