[Pellet-users] A few questions on OWL 1.1 support

[Holger Knublauch]

Evren,

looking at the family.owl example (I assume test_data/misc on SVN has 
the latest version) I noticed that you write

     owl:AntiSymmetricProperty

with a capital S while the online RDF mapping [1] writes them with a 
lower-case s.

There also does not seem to be an example of owl:ReflexiveProperty.

Furthermore, the OWL_1_1.java in the jena folder has a space at the end 
of "ReflexiveProperty ".

Did everyone settle with owl:minInclusive etc instead of xsd:minInclusive?


I am planning to upgrade TopBraid Composer to a recent Pellet version 
soon so that people can use the new OWL 1.1 features.  With respect to 
the stability of the "OWL 1.0" Pellet features, when would you recommend 
to switch?  Is it "safe" to do this soon?

Thanks,
Holger

[1] http://owl1_1.cs.manchester.ac.uk/rdf_mapping.html